"You make an accusation, and I have to prove it false??"

No, John, you don't have to prove anything false. But the fact that no one has been able to prove that Republicans broke the law in Florida in 2000 does not meant that they didn't. Nor does it mean, even if they didn't break any laws, that the things they did were not unethical or immoral.

Like spending millions of dollars of tax payers money to create a bogus list of supposed convicted felons who they removed from the voter rolls. (Meanwhile, Jeb refused to spend a few hundred thousand on voter education and registration drives.) They instructed the company compiling the list to disregared things like dates of birth, social security numbers, Jr.'s and Sr.'s, middle initials, just first name and last name, even if it was only remotely close, or spelled slightly differently.

They even removed people from their rolls who were allegedly convicted of felonies in other states. Then sent out a letter that instructed them how to apply for amnesty, but two weeks later sent another letter, which stated no such amnesty would be granted, and denied that they ever sent the first letter, or even any knowledge of such a letter.

Do you know that George granted such amnesty when he was Gov. of Texas?

Do you know that George Bush signed into Texas law a bill that said that in all cases of a recount, "every effort to ascertain the intent of the voter" should be made? Do you know that in Florida in 2000, some of the ballots required not only the punch of a chad, but required the voter to write in, in his own hand, the name of his choice for President; and that many such ballots, on which the voter wrote "Al Gore" were discounted due to irregularities in the punches above? Is that how we make every effort to "ascertain the intent of the voter"?

I wouldn't want to clog your perfectly good, mindless, blind, loyal right wing postion, with too many annoying facts and details!