Quote:
Originally posted by Val:

For long 4 years he agonized on who to vote for. He chose to vote for Bush because Kerry voted against the Gulf war 13 years ago . Kerry 'flip-flopped' on the Gulf War. What horror! That one mistake by Kerry sealed CWP's vote. He made this choice against this background: the Bush mess in Iraq (more than 1000 dead), the first net loss of jobs since the Great Depression, the country which is deeply divided by the Bush policies of cultural warfare. No matter that Bush took the country to the brink of the economic, political and social self-destruction.
nu2salt,

As you say, CWP is entitled to his opinion. It's his constitutional right. I am questioning his opinion because it just does not make sense. Then again, in our surreal Kafkaesque 1984 BUSHWORLD voicing any opinion for Bush makes you a stand up citizen. The less sane is an opinion the more they repeat it.

For example: The the Duelfer report says, that Saddam was no threat to the U.S. or any other country. So Bush-Cheney (one could think of it as a single person) replies: 'So much more reason to have invaded Iraq.' It drives me nuts. So should I lay off of them because they are entitled to their opinion? \:o

The labor department reports a dismal job creation numbers. Bush-Cheney spin: 'Great. The tax cuts work.' Another opinion I should respect?

I fully expect some Rush wannabee replying with a perfectly sane explanation of this insanity. Your turn. \:D