#926421 - 03/06/0807:10 PM
Re: Bill Has Been Raised for Candlewood Lake Boat Use Permits HB5828
[Re: Crazy Ivan]
bunkerrman
Member
Registered: 07/31/03
Posts: 1667
Loc: Waterbury
"It has to be equitable,'' Morrissey of the DEP said. He insisted that what people pay NE Energy in shoreline management fees must not be confused with a boat sticker plan.
Residents are going to pay NE Energy fees for the privilege of living on the lake, and having decks and docks and boathouses on power company land, not for boating, he said.
Seems to me that the state still stocks Quassy and there is NO PUBLIC ACCESS. Eventually, the fee will be a done deal. General fund be damned, because there will be utility companies grabbing as much as they can. My thinking is that they generate and sell power. They make money and therefore should pay for the cost of the upkeep of thier own livelihood.
"Extra" money? That phrase is a laugh. First time I remember hearing it was from Weicker when he was smoozing the casino tribes and telling us that the new CT State Income Tax was just "extra money".
Big Brother is sadly here. This is going to set a precedent that will only alienate sportsman from what we want to do. Fishing is more than fishing to myself and the people I go with. It is a right, and I liken it to church. Hopefully this is seen for what it is, an unfair taxing of select group/groups of people, and is rejected. Wayne
I fish fresh and salt as well as crab.Streams,rivers,ponds,lakes,bays,oceans.I buy a license so I can keep when I am going to eat it and throw back when I am not.