Buck posted:

"If the Democrats had a candidate who could debate like Kerry and was moderate in scope, with a moderate platform, they would win hands down."

I agree with this statement whole heartedly. Kerry may not be as moderate as we would like, but neither is Bush. To me, this statement illustrates that Bush has not done a good job over the last four years and is easily beatable. While Kerry may not be the ideal candidate I personally believe that he is a far better choice than four more years of Bush. Not only as the lesser of two evils, but as a more desireable alternative to what we have already had. It is a shame that the Democratic Party could not field someone more consistent with Buck's statement. He clearly WOULD win hands down, because Bush is such an incompetent failure.