Spin: That is the second or third time you have accused me of "making something up." Whenever I do cite a web site or book source you say nothing. Whenever I post something from hearsay, or from something I read at one point, or just something I believe in, I can't cite it. Instead of claiming I am making it up, why not just challenge it? Spun and Nu2Salt disagree with me but don't say I am inventing all of this up.

As for anything I have cited thus far, it is absolutely true and stand by it. I am so confident that I would cancel my CTF membership if wrong. I don't believe in not backing up information . You know me better than that Spin.

As for what you stated before, regarding Clinton's impeachment, no we weren't doing al-Qaeda's footwork, because Clinton regarded terrorism not as an act of war during the impeachment issue (which I opposed). It had been internationalized...just yet.

My Liberal professors are the one's who don't research their facts. I have had 2 big debates with 2 different Professors on campus: one over Iraq, the other over Israel. With the first issue, I was mentioning various terrorist organizations, dates, statistics, and books from where I gathered this info, proving that Iraq had ties to terrorism. ALL my professor could do was tell me I was wrong and nothing else. No back-up. No info. As for the second debate, the professor is a Pro-Palestinian Jew , go figure, but he debated extremely well, and although we read the same books and material we had varying opinions and I felt he won the argument.

Flag-Up: I didn't mean that Clinton wanted 9/11 to happen. I was saying that the opportunity to fight terrorism on the scale similar to post-9/11 had not occurred during his Presidency.