Oh, and what part of "I will hunt down and kill the terrorists" would classify Kerry as a pacifist? Or is that the ultimate IHOP waffle? I feel you may not have been listening to both agruments clearly. I know because that statement has become the staple of Kerry's policy regarding homeland defense.
Precisely Spun why Kerry is straddling both sides of the stream. He is vocal in term of aggressiveness towards terrorists (as he should be), but his actions fall short in terms of his language (global test, sensitive war on terror i.e) and his actions (voting against the funding of the troops, calling Allawi a puppet).
I am sure Kerry would make a wonderful President, but just not now. He would make a better peacetime President than a wartime one, and the terrorists would exploit his passiveness if he were elected.
I really can't sleep.
You could be right Henry, but there seems to be tremendous inaccuracies on both sides. Hopefully we can get to the bottom of all of it before November 2nd, but not likely.
Until then, I'll chose the candidate I feel will be more apt to make positive strides. Right now, I feel it's not George Bush. Embracing his simplistic world views, and the application of catch phrases like "It's hard work", just doesn't cut it for me. After all, the terrorists also initially exploited Bush's passiveness. I personally didn't find My Pet goat to be that good a read. :p
Henry your 500 times more intelligent than both men combined. I just can't see someone with your intellect supporting a man who has assaulted the English language as badly as Dubya continues to do during his presidency.
Perhaps it is all of us who will suffer the 10 years it will take for you to qualify to run. It's a damn shame we are reduced to picking the "lesser of 2 evils". God I hate admitting that! Either way, I weap for my children's future.
It's a damn shame we are reduced to picking the "lesser of 2 evils". God I hate admitting that! Either way, I weap for my children's future.
Previous Topic
Index